Archive for the ‘insemnari’ Category
Friday, July 11th, 2014
Posted in acte de vorbire, actiuni rationale, cauzalitate, comunicare, concepte, diverse, epistemologie, filosofia actiunii, filosofia limbajului, filosofia logicii, filosofia religiei, filosofia tehnologiei, idei, insemnari, intentii, logica, metafilosofie, naturalism, pragmatism, rationalitate, senzatii, Wittgenstein | Comments Closed
Thursday, May 29th, 2014
I’ve done the first one in an attempt to clarify my view of philosophy as a conceptual proposal:

The second expresses my thoughts about the dual nature of actions:

In the third case I was trying to think of the different ways in which we understand the idea if necessity:

They are related.
Tags:actions, conceptual proposal, dual nature, necessity, philosophy
Posted in actiuni rationale, amintiri, cauzalitate, concepte, diverse, filosofia actiunii, filosofie, idei, insemnari, metafilosofie, naturalism, pragmatism, probleme | Comments Closed
Tuesday, April 1st, 2014
Let us start with the following simple scheme of belief attribution:
Agent G does action A.
Belief B is a reason for doing A.
—-
Therefore, A believes B.
To take an example, suppose George eats a sandwich. A reason for doing so would be provided by the belief that sandwiches are nutritious, so we could attribute that belief to George.
(more…)
Posted in cauzalitate, epistemologie, filosofia actiunii, filosofia mintii, idei, insemnari, opinii, probleme | Comments Closed
Monday, January 6th, 2014
Just some scribbles, nothing here is publishable.
(more…)
Tags:artifacts, philosophy, rules
Posted in concepte, filosofia actiunii, filosofia tehnologiei, idei, insemnari, intentii, naturalism | Comments Closed
Friday, November 8th, 2013
One might say that in the beginning of Meaning, Grice tries to distinguish between two different vocabularies – the naturalistic and the non-naturalistic one, given the fact that “to mean” figures in both of them. Also, in doing so, he attempts to use a neutral vocabulary, apparently.
(more…)
Tags:grice, nonnatural meaning
Posted in filosofia limbajului, insemnari | Comments Closed
Tuesday, October 1st, 2013
Ceva de acelasi tip cu ceea ce se gaseste aici si aici. Nimic publicabil, doar cateva insemnari (necorectate) pe care le adaug aici pentru a le revedea mai tarziu. Sper sa nu existe suprapuneri prea mari intre aceste insemnari si altele deja existente aici.
(more…)
Posted in acte de vorbire, actiuni rationale, filosofia limbajului, idei, insemnari, logica, metafilosofie, naturalism, rationalitate | Comments Closed
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013
Sa ne inchipuim ca anumiti oameni nu ar putea sa isi lase averea familiei. Dupa moartea lor, toate bunurile pe care le detineau trec in proprietatea statului. Familia nu ramane cu nimic.
Sa ne inchipuim, in plus, ca lucrurile ar sta asa doar in cazul crestinilor. Oamenii care ar declara ca nu sunt crestini nu ar avea astfel de probleme. Intr-o astfel de situatie, ar fi limpede ca crestinii sunt discriminati.
(more…)
Posted in idei, insemnari, opinii | Comments Closed
Friday, February 15th, 2013
Si totusi, pentru a spune ca ma bazez pe X intr-o anumita situatie, sau ca am incredere ca X va face A, nu e suficient ca X sa fie responsabil pentru a face A (sau ceea ce ma astept sa faca in situatia respectiva). Exista, de pilda, parinti iresponsabili. Ei au responsabilitatea sa faca anumite lucruri, dar nu le fac. Cand spun ca ei sunt iresponsabili nu ii absolv de responsabilitatile pe care le au, ca parinti, ci doar observ ca sunt incapabili sa le indeplineasca.
(more…)
Posted in actiuni rationale, cauzalitate, filosofia actiunii, idei, insemnari, metafilosofie, naturalism, probleme, rationalitate | Comments Closed