Archive for the ‘cauzalitate’ Category
Friday, May 5th, 2017
Some notes written about one year ago. I did revise them, but nothing is publishable.
(more…)
Tags:actions, intentions, psychology, responsibility
Posted in acte de vorbire, actiuni rationale, cauzalitate, epistemologie, filosofia actiunii, filosofia mintii, insemnari, intentii, opinii | Comments Closed
Friday, January 8th, 2016
These are some notes which I wrote down in the last few months. I was thinking of writing a book, so I wrote in order to make the topic of my book a bit more clear. This is the only use of this text – to make it clear for myself what I am supposed to write about in my book. The only result of writing everything found here, which I would acknowledge, is that the title of my book should be ‘Reason, Language and Actions’. Nothing else should be taken seriously, nothing is worth mentioning etc. I did not proofread the text for grammar mistakes. If you want to take a look at it, you’re on your own.
(more…)
Posted in acte de vorbire, actiuni rationale, amintiri, cauzalitate, concepte, filosofia actiunii, filosofia limbajului, filosofia logicii, filosofia mintii, filosofie, idei, insemnari, intentii, metafilosofie, metastuff, naturalism, opinii, pragmatism, probleme, rationalitate, Wittgenstein | Comments Closed
Friday, December 19th, 2014
Cateva ganduri din ultima luna de zile. Nimic publicabil.
(more…)
Tags:identitatea persoanei, persoane, raspundere
Posted in actiuni rationale, cauzalitate, epistemologie, filosofia actiunii, idei, insemnari, metafizica | Comments Closed
Friday, July 11th, 2014
Posted in acte de vorbire, actiuni rationale, cauzalitate, comunicare, concepte, diverse, epistemologie, filosofia actiunii, filosofia limbajului, filosofia logicii, filosofia religiei, filosofia tehnologiei, idei, insemnari, intentii, logica, metafilosofie, naturalism, pragmatism, rationalitate, senzatii, Wittgenstein | Comments Closed
Thursday, May 29th, 2014
I’ve done the first one in an attempt to clarify my view of philosophy as a conceptual proposal:
The second expresses my thoughts about the dual nature of actions:
In the third case I was trying to think of the different ways in which we understand the idea if necessity:
They are related.
Tags:actions, conceptual proposal, dual nature, necessity, philosophy
Posted in actiuni rationale, amintiri, cauzalitate, concepte, diverse, filosofia actiunii, filosofie, idei, insemnari, metafilosofie, naturalism, pragmatism, probleme | Comments Closed
Tuesday, April 1st, 2014
Let us start with the following simple scheme of belief attribution:
Agent G does action A.
Belief B is a reason for doing A.
—-
Therefore, A believes B.
To take an example, suppose George eats a sandwich. A reason for doing so would be provided by the belief that sandwiches are nutritious, so we could attribute that belief to George.
(more…)
Posted in cauzalitate, epistemologie, filosofia actiunii, filosofia mintii, idei, insemnari, opinii, probleme | Comments Closed
Friday, February 15th, 2013
Si totusi, pentru a spune ca ma bazez pe X intr-o anumita situatie, sau ca am incredere ca X va face A, nu e suficient ca X sa fie responsabil pentru a face A (sau ceea ce ma astept sa faca in situatia respectiva). Exista, de pilda, parinti iresponsabili. Ei au responsabilitatea sa faca anumite lucruri, dar nu le fac. Cand spun ca ei sunt iresponsabili nu ii absolv de responsabilitatile pe care le au, ca parinti, ci doar observ ca sunt incapabili sa le indeplineasca.
(more…)
Posted in actiuni rationale, cauzalitate, filosofia actiunii, idei, insemnari, metafilosofie, naturalism, probleme, rationalitate | Comments Closed
Friday, December 21st, 2012
Le voi transcrie aici, fiindca imi e mai usor sa le adun la un loc in felul acesta. Ca de obicei, nimic din ce e aici nu mi se pare publicabil.
(more…)
Posted in acte de vorbire, actiuni rationale, cauzalitate, comunicare, diverse, epistemologie, filosofia actiunii, filosofia limbajului, filosofie, idei, insemnari, intentii, opinii, pragmatism, probleme, rationalitate | Comments Closed
