Am primit-o de la Jane. Ne cerem scuze ca am raspuns asa de tarziu. Leapsa suna cam asa: ia cartea cea mai apropiata, deschide-o la pagina 123, copiaza cele patru fraze de la a cincea incolo.

To agree that they did would be to concede the very point of contingent identity and to frustrate the clear intent of its advocates, which was that it was to be a relation compatible with counterfactual divergence. Understanding contingent identity as sameness of nonhypothetical properties, on the other hand, preserves its point and sustain it against the “proof” of its impossibility. Still, why did it even seem that contingent identity entailed absolute indiscernibility? Probably because it was taken for granted that contingently identical things were (at least) properly identical, only – and this was their distinction – not necessarily so.

Cea mai apropiata carte de noi era cea de pe birou, Metaphysics – An Anthology, edited by Jaegwon Kim and Ernest Sosa. Nu am vrut sa trisam cu “Ciubotele de sapte leghe si alte moduri de a muri”, a doua carte ca apropiere. 🙂

Dam si noi leapsa mai departe pentru Vio, Ionuca si Alexandra.