Monthly Archives: January 2007

Dactilo (13): yx.-

Scrieti cu maparea romaneasca a tastaturii, right? Asa ca “y” e acolo unde scrie “z” si e batut cu degetul mic de la mana stanga. Iar “x” e langa el, deci la inelar. Inelarul de la mana dreapta e pentru “.”, iar la degetul mic de la mana dreapta aveti pe randul de jos cratima (“-“). Asta e iar o chestie specifica pt. tastatura romaneasca. Well, va prindeti voi. πŸ™‚
Continue reading

De ce sa nu-si doreasca jurnalistii sa fie bloggeri?

Unii sunt. Cu mici exceptii, interactioneaza mai mult intre ei si nu cu blogarimea de rand. Altii tocmai au devenit blogeri (vezi Ioana Avadani). Altii nu vor sa-si faca blog (iata ce scrie azi Lucian Mandruta – am aflat de la Costin Ionescu).

Oricum, Bobby Voicu a pus o intrebare buna. A pus mai multe intrebari bune, dar acum o am in minte pe asta: “De ce ar trebui ca idealul tau, in calitate de blogger, sa fie sa devii jurnalist?”

Wittgenstein in a nutshell (2)

[the first part is here]

At first he tried to do this by showing them that there is a perfect match between our language and our world. That is, every time we say something meaningful, we say something which is either true or false about the world. But philosophical problems are not about anything in this world, so they cannot even be expressed, let alone answered, in meaningful language.
Continue reading

Ce-am scris la netoo 5

[am pus textul asa cum l-am scos de pe Palm]

Vorbeste Manafu. Zice ca sa vorbeasca invitatii si dupa aia sa vina intrebarile si concluziile. Il invita pe Iulian (Comanescu) sa deschida sesiunea. Va urma Cristea. Iulian a dat niste foi[*]. Zice ca discutia a pornit de la problema de credibilitate a blogurilor.
Continue reading

Wittgenstein in a nutshell (1)

This is not an academic text. It is not even a serious one, you could think. And, what’s even worse, it is of no use to you. Maybe it’s a subterfuge I use to express my own boorish ideas about this and that and everything else, as you might eventually suspect.

However, I try to pass it for a small presentation of Wittgenstein’s views. I do not assume that you know who this Wittgenstein guy was, so I’ll tell you right away: he was a philosopher. By the way, you don’t have to know what philosophy is. πŸ™‚
Continue reading